Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 9, 2010No. 2009-1354PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
David Richardson appeals from a final decision of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc., 610 F.Supp.2d 1046 (D.Ariz.2009). After a bench trial, the distinct court found that Stanley Works, Inc. (“Stanley”) did not infringe U.S. Patent D507,167 (“the '167 patent”). Because the court correctly construed the claim at issue and correctly determined that the patent was not infringed, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Richardson owns the '167 patent, a design patent that claims the design for a multi-function carpentry tool that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Jerome R. Lewis v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Park B. Smith, Inc. v. Chf Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Sport Dimension, Inc. v. the Coleman Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Lanard Toys Limited v. Dolgencorp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.