Legal Opinion
Chemical Bank v. Dippolito
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 28, 1995No. 2:94-cv-04535PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Today we address Plaintiff Chemical Bank’s motion for summary judgment in this mortgage foreclosure action. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Martin Dippolito and Michael Tiedeken, the defendants in this action, purchased real estate in Glenside, Pennsylvania (“the property”) on April 28, 1989. Messrs. Dippolito and Tiedeken borrowed $106,000 at 12.75% interest from Bell Savings Bank PaSA (“Bell”) in order to purchase the property, and agreed to repay the loan in installments of $1,175.61 per month…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harold Ex Rel. Estate of Harold v. McGannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- TIG Insurance v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Firemen's Insurance v. Tray-Pak Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Fannie Mae v. Cresheim Valley Realty Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Fannie Mae v. Harrison Court Realty Co., L.P., et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.