State v. Manning
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Phillip Charles Manning appeals from the district court’s criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to disobedience of a judicial order. He argues the district court abused its discretion when it excluded evidence he wished to present in support of his necessity defense. Concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Manning was divorced from his wife in May 2002. Manning v. Manning, 2006 ND 67, ¶ 3, 711 N.W.2d 149. The parties were granted split physical custody of their two children. Id. The split custody arrangement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SahrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Manning v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Wanner v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Fargo v. NikleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.