Legal Opinion

State v. Just

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2006No. 20060146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Shane Just appeals from an order denying his motion to arrest judgment under N.D.R.Crim.P. 3⅛. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Shane Just was tried and convicted by a jury of twelve counts of surreptitious intrusion. The complaint alleged Just had hidden a video camera in the bathroom/laundry room of his home and had secretly recorded several females changing their clothes. The charging language mirrored most of the statutory language for surreptitious intrusion. However, it failed to allege the recording device was used “through the window or other aperture of ... [a] place where a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Montana v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fonder v. FonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. KirkpatrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wilson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. WachtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API