Legal Opinion

People v. Aarness

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2005No. 03CA0096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

Defendant, Joshua M. Aarness, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of drug and weapons charges. Following the verdict, defendant pleaded guilty to habitual criminal counts. Under the plea agreement, he reserved the right to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We conclude the motion should have been granted, and therefore we reverse and remand for a new trial.

The police department received an anonymous telephone call that identified defendant, gave his physical description, reported he was armed,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Joshua M. AARNESSSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API