Legal Opinion

Farmers Home Mutual Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North America

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1978No. 4922-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This case concerns the coverage of a protection and indemnity (hereafter P & I) clause in a yacht insurance policy.

*817Facts

Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Company insured Mr. and Mrs. Robert Lindrud under a homeowner's policy which covered bodily injury occurring on their Mercer Island property. Insurance Company of North America (INA) insured the Lindruds under a yacht policy containing a P & I clause which stated:

If the assured shall by reason of his interest in the insured yacht become liable to pay and shall pay any sum or sums in respect of any responsibility, claim, demand, damages or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lanasse v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Western Pac. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Ames v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. R. A. Hanson Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Toll Bridge Authority v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Ashburn v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Stanton v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API