Legal Opinion
Stanton v. Bayliner Marine Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1993No. 60031-7PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
In consolidated actions against Bayliner Marine Corporation and Olympic Sales, Inc. (hereafter collectively Bayliner), plaintiffs seek recovery of the cost of replacing or repairing damaged yachts. Bayliner seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision reversing the trial court’s order of partial summary judgment in its favor. We reverse the Court of Appeals.
Background
In December 1985, plaintiffs James Stanton, Winnifred Stanton, and Stanton Investment Company purchased the M/ Y Moonraker, a 45-foot model 4550 Bayliner motor yacht, from Olympic Sales, Inc., doing business as Olympic Boat…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Alloway v. General Marine Industries, L.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- AFFILIATED FM v. LTK Consulting ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Axess Intern. Ltd. v. Intercargo Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.