Legal Opinion

Luther v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1927No. 20397. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries and also for damages to an automobile owned and driven by him at the time it collided with an automobile owned by the defendant and operated by one of its agents. The defendant responded by answer and a cross-complaint in which it sought damages to its automobile. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion' of all' the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict as against the plaintiff, and, after- the court had indicated a probable intention of granting the motion, moved for a Voluntary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  2. Sheffield v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dyke v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Muehlbauer v. KloknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Geitner v. StephensonWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Tutewiler v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clark v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Frenier v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API