Legal Opinion
Rankin v. Sowinski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
119 N.J. Super. 393 (1972)
291 A.2d 849
FLORENCE RANKIN AND RICHARD RANKIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
RONALD SOWINSKI, D.D.S., JOSEPH T. RUFF, D.D.S. AND MARK DONNER, D.D.S., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 8, 1971.
Decided June 3, 1972.
Before Judges COLLESTER, MINTZ and LYNCH.
Mr. Harry R. Burton argued the cause for appellants Ronald Sowinski and Mark Donner (Messrs. Burton, Quackenboss & Axelrod, attorneys; Robert T. Quackenboss of counsel).
Mr. John E. Keefe argued the cause for appellant Joseph T. Ruff (Messrs. Cohen, Hoagland, Cohen &…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Tortorello v. ReinfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Lopez v. SwyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Rothman v. SilberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Lynch v. RubackySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Geisz v. Greater Baltimore Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.