Legal Opinion

Baugham v. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1916No. 327PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ERROR TO THE'SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. The facts, which involve the construction and application of the contributory negligence provisions of the Employers’ Liability Act, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Action for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, brought in the Circuit Court of Norfolk County, State of Virginia, by plaintiff in error (we shall call him plaintiff), administrator of the .estate of Richard T. Baugham.

The ground of action was that the railroad company, an interstate carrier, caused by its negligence the death of. plaintiff’s intestate while he was employed and engaged in such commerce.

Richard T. Baugham was between the ages of eighteen and twenty years and was engaged by the railroad company to act as brakeman in its yard at Port Norfolk, Virginia. On the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. LeonidasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Murczek v. Powers Label Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OttWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hoch v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API