Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King

This action to recover for personal injuries begun in a state court, was removed to a Circuit Court and there decided for the plaintiff. To obtain a reversal of a judgment affirming, the case is here upon an assumption that a constitutional question is involved which gives jurisdiction. It is admitted that such question, that is, the repugnancy of the Safety Appliance Law to the Constitution, is now not open to controversy because of a recent decision. Southern Railway Co. V. United, States, ante, p. 20. Yet, as the case is here, other errors relied upon, it is urged, must be decided. But…