Legal Opinion

Bertonazzi v. Hillman, Adm'x

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 1966No. [No. 137, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This case turns on whether the period of limitations of six calendar months after the date of qualification by the personal representative of a deceased tort-feasor prescribed by Code (1964 Replacement Vol.), Art. 93, § 112, was tolled by a suit brought in a county in which neither the decedent nor his administratrix resided.

The appellant was injured in March 1962 by the alleged negligence of an employee of Edward Hillman, who operated a parking lot. The appellant’s lawyer made claim against Hill-man’s insurer and there were dealings and negotiations between them from July 1962 to March 14,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Chandlee v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Kumar v. DhandaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. DhandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API