Arco Pipeline Co. v. S/S Trade Star
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Taylor and Anderson Towing and Light-erage Company (“Taylor”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Fed.R.Civ.P.) 37(a) for an order compelling *417Trade Oil Company, S.A., to answer Taylor’s interrogatories 9(a), 9(b) and 11(e), filed July 13, 1978. Interrogatory 9(a) reads as follows: “State whether you have consulted with any person who is not expected to testify at the trial of this ease, relating to or in any way concerning the collision between the S/S Trade Star and the Arco Pipeline pier on May 22, 1977, and/or the events leading…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baki v. B. F. Diamond Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Sea Colony, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Perry v. W. S. Darley & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Ager v. Jane C. Stormont Hospital & Training School for NursesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ager v. Stormont-Vail HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- In re Sinking of Barge "Ranger I"District Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.