Sea Colony, Inc. v. Continental Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAYTON, District Judge.
Defendants have filed a motion for discovery. Interrogatory #7, asked for the names of all experts retained by plaintiff who were not intended to be called at trial. Plaintiff refused to answer upon the ground that the answer tended to reveal the work product of an *114attorney and that no showing of exceptional circumstances was made.
Plaintiff will be required to answer the interrogatory in question.1 Because the result here reached is at variance with at least one other reported authority, it was thought desirable that the reasons be stated.
Rule 26(b)(4)(B) 2…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Perry v. W. S. Darley & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
3Cited by16 opinions
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Baki v. B. F. Diamond Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Ager v. Jane C. Stormont Hospital & Training School for NursesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ager v. Stormont-Vail HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- In re Sinking of Barge "Ranger I"District Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.