Baldwin v. Georgia Automatic Gas Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
In ground 4 of their motion for a new trial, the plaintiffs assign error on the charge of the court: “that, when a party upon whom the burden of an issue rests, seeks to carry it, not by direct proof, but by inferences, the circumstances he places in proof must tend in some proximate degree to establish the conclusion which he claims, and for this the facts shown must not only reasonably support that conclusion but also render less probable all inconsistent conclusions. In civil cases such as this the law requires that the plaintiff must, by a preponderance of the evidence, show that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Stansfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Holliday v. Mayor of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hill v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Community Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Cochran v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Miller v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.