Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 2012No. 12-298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

bThe defendant was charged with video voyeurism, a violation of La.R.S. 14:283. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty to that charge. The trial court subsequently imposed a sentence of three years at hard labor, with credit for time served and without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. The defendant appeals. For the following reason, we affirm with instructions.

Factual and Procedural Background

The defendant, Christopher Perry, was charged with video voyeurism, a violation of La.R.S. 14:283. According to the State, P.L.,1 a friend of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. State v. MageeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. State v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. State v. ComeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SaltzmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. State v. QueenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. State v. DrummerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. State v. NguyenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API