In Re GAULT
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
387 U.S. 1 (1967)
IN RE GAULT ET AL.
No. 116.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 6, 1966.
Decided May 15, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
Norman Dorsen argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Melvin L. Wulf, Amelia D. Lewis and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Frank A. Parks, Assistant Attorney General of Arizona, argued the cause for appellee, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief was Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General.
Merritt W. Green argued the cause for the Ohio Association of Juvenile Court Judges, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Fortas; Concurrence · Black; Concurrence · White; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. R.V.California Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Morgan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- State v. Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.