Milliken Imprinting Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters' statement of the case: This being a case in equity, the facts were not formally found by the court but are stated in its opinion.
Read the full summary
The Reporters' statement of the case: This being a case in equity, the facts were not formally found by the court but are stated in its opinion. The following are the exhibits referred to in the opinion: “ Exhibit A. “ Treasury Department, “ Office of ti-ie Commissioner of Internal Revenue, “ 'Washington D. 0., April 85,1899. “ To contractors for imprinting stamps: “ In awarding contracts for imprinting stamps on checks, drafts, and other instruments for the year commencing July 1st, 1899, it has been determined to add the following provisions to contracts in addition to those now contained…
1Opinion of the CourtWeldoh, J.
The petitioner is a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its place of business in the city of New York.
On the 19th day of June, 1899, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue entered into contract with the claimant under the provisions of the act of Congress entitled “An act to provide ways and moans to meet war expenditures, and for other purposes,” approved June 13, 1898 (30 Stat. L., sec. 25, p. 445), by which contract the claimant was to print internal-revenue stamps for the defendants of certain denominations at the price of 80 cents per thousand,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Garfielde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Harvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Harvey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1872
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klamath & Modoc Tribes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
- Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979