Legal Opinion

Forrest Laidley and George P. Vye v. Barbara Bogart Heigho, Maxwell Stevens Heigho and Security-First National Bank

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 16, 1963No. 18709_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

By this diversity action, brought in the district court in Los Angeles, California, appellants allege that in 1950 their assignors became creditors of William Stevens Heigho, who died in 1956, and they seek to collect the debt out of assets of a trust created by the decedent in 1951. Appellants contend that the creation of the trust, because it rendered Heigho insolvent, constituted a transfer in fraud of creditors under California Civil Code, § 3439.04. 1 The action was dismissed by the district court and this appeal followed.

Appellants never did reduce their claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Rice v. SchubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Bierschbach v. HeighoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Richardson v. MichelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Clark v. RossowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Jay H. Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the JHC Trusts I and II v. Newbiss Property, L.P and Sandcastle Homes, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Universal Home Improvement v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API