Legal Opinion

Erie Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1984No. C4-83-193, CX-83-196PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Taconite ore was originally taxed in Minnesota based on annual production. The tax on production is “in lieu” of other taxes, including property taxes that could be imposed on taconite producers. See Minn. Stat. § 298.25 (1982). In 1977 the Minnesota legislature amended Minn.Stat. § 298.24 to compute the “in lieu” tax in one of two ways. The tax is now the greater of the annual taconite production or the average of the last three years of production. The tax court held the averaging method was permissible, but declared unconstitutional the annual production method when…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States Express Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Westling v. County of Mille LacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Wilson v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. In Re LTV Steel Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API