Legal Opinion
Hyosung America, Inc. v. Sumagh Textile Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 1996No. 94 Civ. 0568 (SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
Sumagh Textile Co., Ltd. (“Sumagh”) moves for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the amended complaint filed by Hyosung America, Inc. (“Hyosung”). The complaint pleads nine causes of action, including claims arising from and relating to Sumagh’s alleged breach of warranty, breach of contract, fraud, violation of both the Lanham Act and the Wool Products Labeling Act, and claims for compensatory and punitive damages. Hyosung alleges that Orkid Tex, Inc. (“Orkid”) ordered fabric from Sumagh that was to contain 65% rayon and 35% wool but that,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.p.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Hyosung America, Inc. v. Sumagh Textile Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Marshak v. TreadwellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- R.L. Polk & Co. v. INFOUSA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Hyosung America, Inc. v. Sumagh Textile Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.