Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Touche Ross & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
Touche Ross & Co. (Touche) appeals from an order granting the motion of plaintiff and cross-appellant Industrial Indemnity Co. (Industrial) for a new trial on the issue of damages. It contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion. Applying the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bily v. Arthur Young & Co. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 370 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d 51, 834 P.2d 745], we agree. Therefore, we reverse the new trial order. We also reject Industrial’s cross-appeal from the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Buttes Gas and Oil Co. (Buttes) was a publicly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nycal Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Soderberg v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Murphy v. BDO Seidman, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- California Indemnity Insurance Premium Finance Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.