Legal Opinion
Ditullio v. Boehm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2011No. 10-36012PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
OPINION
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
In November 2004, appellee Josef Boehm pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to engage in human trafficking, and admitted that between 2001 and December 22, 2003, he conspired with others to provide controlled substances to several minors and recruited them to engage in sexual activity. Appellant Miranda Ditullio alleges that she is one of the victims identified in Boehm’s plea agreement and seeks compensatory and punitive damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1589 et seq.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Tanvir v. FNU TanzinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Velez v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.