Skipper v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating the case as above).
In order to determine the right of the appellants to have the issuance of an injunction, as the only means of effectuating a decree upon the merits of the principal controversy, there is included as a necessary consequence (1) the proper construction of the deed from H. T. Elder to the trustees of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, and (2) the decision as to the rights and privileges the several parties to the suit may have in the oil under the land under the established facts in the case.
The rule is too well established to admit of debate that the deed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Swayne v. Lone Acre Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. SkipperTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Allegheny County Port Authority v. FlahertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- West Texas Utilities Co. v. Farmers' State Bank in MerkelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Gladewater County Line Independent School Dist. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Eyssen v. ZeppaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.