Legal Opinion

Gladewater County Line Independent School Dist. v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1933No. 4303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

There is presented for decision the point in view, in effect, of whether or not the title to the acre of land in suit revested in the original grantor on the abandonment of its use for school purposes. It is the rule that in the absence of a statute or provision in the grant there is no right of reversion where land, acquired in fee simple for .public school purposes, is no longer used or is abandoned for such use. 56 O. J. § 461, p. 461. In this state there is no statutory provision for reversion of the title to the grantor where the property is not used or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Robinson v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Sharp v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Wood v. COASTAL STATES CRUDE GATHERING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Atmos Energy Corporation v. Charles L. Paul, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
  5. the Unknown Stockholders of the K.M. Van Zandt Land Company and the Unknown Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of the Unknown Stockholders of the K.M. Van Zandt Land Company AND Edmund P. Cranz and Neil L. Van Zandt v. Whitehead Equities, JV., Jagee Real Properties, L.P., Garview Partners, L.P., Spokane Ventures, Ltd., Inc., Nona, Inc., Will Ed Wadley and FPA Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API