Legal Opinion

Ermocida v. Destination Resorts Hawaii, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2005No. 26269Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

FOLEY, J.

Claimant-Appellant Edward F. Ermocida (Ermocida) appeals the Decision and Order filed on November 25, 2003 by the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIR-AB). The LIRAB decided that the offset provision set forth in Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-33(a)(l) (Supp.2004)1 applied to Ermocida’s prior out-of-state permanent partial disability award.

On appeal,2 Ermocida claims the following: (1) the LIRAB erred as a matter of law when it determined that HRS § 386-33(a)(l) applied to out-of-state disability awards, and (2) the LIRAB should have granted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bumanglag v. Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API