Legal Opinion

Vakilian v. Shaw

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2003No. Nos. 01-2377, 01-2443PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Defendant Wesley Shaw, Special Agent for the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, appeals the district court’s denial of absolute and qualified immunity regarding claims brought by the estate of Dr. Mohammad M. Vakilian pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) for alleged violations of Vakilian’s constitutional rights during the state’s investigar tion and prosecution of him for Medicaid fraud. Vakilian-cross-appeals, requesting that we exercise our pendent appellate jurisdiction to reverse the district court’s order granting summary…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Terry Summers v. Simon Leis, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Perez v. Oakland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Doe v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API