Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Holtermann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1930No. 8498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This cause was tried by the court below without a jury and in the unexplained absence of plaintiff in error, who, as defendant, had timely filed his answer to the plaintiff’s petition. From an adverse judgment plaintiff in error prosecutes writ of error. No statement of facts accompanies the record here.

The statement of the cause of action asserted in defendant in error’s trial petition, being commendably brief, will he copied:

“That heretofore, on the various dates between December 5, 1927, and January 25, 1928, this plaintiff performed certain labor and furnished and delivered to and for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Swan v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Ware v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Threadgill v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Kasprowicz v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API