Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Kremer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1990No. C9-90-2461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

FACTS

Petitioner Debra Amlee-Loveland seeks a writ of prohibition preventing the trial court from compelling her attendance at a second independent medical examination.

After Amlee-Loveland and her husband were injured in an automobile accident, they commenced a negligence lawsuit against Hildegarde Kremer for personal injuries sustained in the accident. The claims adjuster for Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Kremer’s automobile liability insurer, said that before the insurance company would offer a settlement, it needed the results of an independent medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wasmund v. NunamakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Haynes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Wills v. Red Lake Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re QuinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of QuinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Linton v. PCA Family Medical Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API