Legal Opinion
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 2, 1986No. C1-86-1168PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Petitioner by writ of mandamus seeks vacation of a trial court order denying protective relief regarding taking of petitioner’s deposition. He claims (1) inquiry cannot be made of his mental processes and (2) he is immune from tort liability. We grant extraordinary relief.
FACTS
Under statutory authority, petitioner Commissioner of Labor and Industry Steve Keefe promulgated rules regarding workers’ compensation rehabilitation services effective January 30, 1984. See Minn.R. 5220.0100-1910 (1985 & Supp.1986); see also Minn.Stat. §§ 176.102, subds. 2, 10, 176.83,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Waller v. Powers Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Paige v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Monti v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Loveland v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. LiburdSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.