Legal Opinion
Lane v. Holderman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 28, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
40 N.J. Super. 329 (1956)
123 A.2d 56
CHRISTOPHER LANE, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 14, 1956.
Decided May 28, 1956.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. James E. Fagan argued the cause for petitioners (Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch & Fagan, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas L. Franklin argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General).
Mr. Roger Hinds filed a brief as amicus curiae representing National Consumers' League, Consumers' League…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re the Registrant, C.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. CongdonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- State v. WattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Newark Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Hotel Suburban System, Inc. v. HoldermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.