Legal Opinion

Chemical Bank v. Paul

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1993No. 1-90-0362PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE TULLY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant David Paul signed a personal guaranty of $5 million in connection with $90 million in loans received from Chemical Bank. After declaring the loans in default, Chemical foreclosed on the underlying property, which resulted in a deficiency of $40 million. Chemical then brought suit on the guaranty, wherein Paul alleged, as an affirmative defense, Chemical’s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Chemical appeals from the jury’s finding in favor of Paul.

The undisputed facts are as follows. In November…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Foster Enterprises, Inc. v. Germania Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Farnor v. Irmco Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Vincent v. DoebertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. VIII South Michigan AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. LaSalle Bank Nat'l Assoc. v. Paramont PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Bank One, Springfield v. RoscettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Steven M. RaymanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Profit Management Development, Inc. v. Jacobson, Brandvik & Anderson, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API