Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pete v. Eklund

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1936No. 30,751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

John H. Pete appeals from a judgment of the district court of St. Louis county affirming the action of the county board of said county in dismissing appellant from his employment as road patrol foreman.

We refer to John H. Pete, the relator, as plaintiff, and to the members of the county board, the respondents, as defendants.

The plaintiff is an honorably discharged sailor of the United States Navy wrho served in the World War. He ivas employed by St. Louis county in doing road maintenance work for some time prior to 1934. How long does not clearly appear. About August,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. In re MasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Krueger v. King Midas Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Brokmeier v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Village of CohassetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Hughes v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Lund v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Webster v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API