Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentMeyer, Justice
Because I would conclude that even under a rational basis standard of review the statute fails a Uniformity Clause challenge, I respectfully dissent.
I
In my view, the Act must be viewed in light of the litigation that gave rise to it. The state’s 1994 lawsuit against the major cigarette manufacturers and their trade associations traces its origins to the formation of the Tobacco Institute and the Tobacco Industry Research Committee, later renamed the Council for Tobacco Research. In its 1994 lawsuit, the state alleged that, by forming these trade associations, the tobacco industry “undertook a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- National Tea Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.