Legal Opinion

National Tea Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1939No. Nos. 31,948, 31,949PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Two cases are here upon the state’s appeals from judgments rendered upon separate findings made by the court in each case. As both cases involve identical questions of law and, to a controlling extent, identical questions of fact, we shall discuss only the National Tea Company case and shall refer to it as plaintiff and to the state as defendant.

An action was brought by plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of L. 1933, c. 213 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1936 Supp. §§ 5887-1 to 5887-18), as amended by Ex. Sess. L. 1933-1934, c. 16 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1936 Supp. §§ 5887-11,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. In Re Taxes for 1961 on Real Estate Owned by Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API