In Re: Discipline of Timothy Titolo

v. Forest Hills Subdivision, 129 Nev., Adv. Op. 9,

294 P.3d 427, 432

(2013); Weddell v. H20, Inc., 128 Nev., Adv. Op. 9,

271 P.3d 743, 748

(2012); Ogawa v. Ogawa, 125 Nev. 660, 668,

221 P.3d 699, 704

(2009). In contrast, a hearing panel's conclusions of law and recommended discipline are reviewed de novo. SCR 105(3)(b). Whether particular factual findings establish an RPC violation is a question of law and therefore is subject to de novo review under SCR 105(3)(b). See LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLC,

331 P.3d 1147, 1157

(Wash. 2014) (stating, in legal malpractice action, that "[w]hether a…