Baebel v. RIVER OAKS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CURTISS BROWN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a suit brought to collect the balance due on a promissory note. The note was executed by appellant Arthur R. Bae-bel and was payable to appellee River Oaks Bank & Trust Company. Appellant answered the suit by general denial and filed a cross-action alleging usury. After a hearing on appellee’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered judgment that River Oaks Bank & Trust Company recover the sum of $4,938.60 plus interest thereon. Appellant’s cross-action is not mentioned in the judgment but presumably was disposed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. EasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Richards v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Texas National Corp. v. United Systems International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ross v. Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Citizens State Bank of Dickinson v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Teer v. DuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Roland v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979