Legal Opinion

Ross v. Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1995No. B14-91-00485-CVPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

CANNON, Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgments granted in favor of appellees. Appellants bring a single point of error alleging the trial court erred in granting the summary judgments in favor of appellees. On original submission, we found that not all of the appellees had addressed all of the causes of action pled by appellants. Ross v. Arkwright Mut Ins. Co., 834 S.W.2d 385, 389 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992), rev’d, 866 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.1993). Therefore, we held that because all issues had not been expressly presented to the trial court, there was no final…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Banc One Capital Partners Corp. v. KneipperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Bandera Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. GilchristTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cuyler v. Minns, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API