Legal Opinion
Wesalo v. Commissioner of Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus by eleven citizens of the Commonwealth. The case was heard by a single justice upon the petition, as amended, and special matter set up in the answer by way of demurrer. This special matter is that the petitioners set forth no case calling for relief, and that the petitioners allege no facts entitling them to the relief for which they pray. It was ordered that so much of the answer as is by way of demurrer be sustained, and the case was then reported for the consideration of the full court.
The allegations of the petition in substance are that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- City of Boston v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Brest v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Club Aluminum Co. v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Elmer v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Doherty v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Robichaud v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Houghton v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.