Legal Opinion
Hope v. Perales
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.
This is an action challenging the constitutionality of the Prenatal Care Assistance Program (Public Health Law § 2520 et seq.) (PCAP), a medical assistance program for pregnant women with incomes at or below 100 and 185% of the Federal poverty line, offering services designed to promote a healthy pregnancy, delivery and recovery.
Plaintiffs, 2 women with incomes between 100% and 185% of the Federal poverty line; 4 physicians who practice as obstetricians and gynecologists; 1 nurse-midwife affiliated with a New York City hospital; 7 health care…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. ArthurNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Hope v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. M.K.R.Justice Court of Village of Fleischmanns · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.