Legal Opinion

Hope v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs, who include income-eligible women, physicians and various health care organizations, commenced this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to challenge the constitutionality of the New York State Prenatal Care Assistance Program (PCAP), enacted pursuant to chapter 584 of the Laws of 1989 and codified in sections 2521, 2522 and 2529 of the Public Health Law. Defendants, the Commissioners of the New York State Department of Social Services and the Department of Health, are responsible for administering the program and promulgating guidelines thereunder.*…

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Women's Health Center of West Virginia, Inc. v. PanepintoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. ArthurNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Women's Health Center of West Virginia, Inc. v. PanepintoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API