Legal Opinion

Henson v. Henson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1952No. 386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

Tbe single question presented is whether in answer to a petition for partition one tenant in common may set up claim for amounts expended to remove an encumbrance on tbe common property.

Tbe court below overruled tbe plaintiff’s demurrer to tbe answer on tbis point, and in tbis we concur.

Petitions for partition are equitable in their nature, and the court has jurisdiction to consider the rights of the parties under the principles of equity and to do justice between the parties. Raymer v. McLelland, 216 N.C. 443, 5 S.E. 2d 321; Trust Co. v. Watkins, 215 N.C. 292, 1 S.E. 2d 853; Gibbs v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Trust Co. v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Jenkins v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. McLamb v. . McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wall v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Roberts v. BarloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API