State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Structo Division, King Seeley Thermos Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs, State Farm Fire and Casualty, et al. (State Farm), appeal from the trial court’s granting of Structo Division’s (Structo) motion for judgment on the evidence.
We affirm.
Structo was the manufacturer of a propane gas grill which was being used by Glen and Pat Foster on the balcony of their second floor apartment, when a fire started at a connection of the grill, and spread to surrounding apartments resulting in substantial property damage. The fire occurred on August 26,1983. Plaintiff insurance companies are insurers of the owner of the real property and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cornette v. Searjeant Metal Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room ThreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Gilbert v. Stone City Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Chrysler Corporation v. AlumbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Structo Division, King Seeley Thermos Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of America v. Lake Shore Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Structo Division, King Seeley Thermos Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988