Legal Opinion

Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 13, 1989No. S85-291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for consideration of the discretionary exercise of pendent jurisdiction over plaintiff Ronald Zepik’s state law claims. Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc., 856 F.2d 936 (7th Cir.1988). For the reasons that follow, the court declines to exercise that jurisdiction, and dismisses the state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

I

Mr. Zepik originally brought this action against five defendants, alleging a federal claim under the reporting…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philan Ins. Ltd. v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Simon v. Northwestern UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Welborn v. Ethicon Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API