Legal Opinion
Simms v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 5, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 The Governor of Arizona and the Director of the Department of Gaming (collectively the “State”) 1 appeal a trial court ruling prohibiting the Arizona Department of Gaming (“Department”) from denying an applicant’s request to withdraw his application for certification to provide gaming services. Because we conclude that the Department has the implied authority to deny such requests, we reverse.
¶ 2 Jeremy Simms, as a part owner of T.P. Racing, L.L.L.P., submitted an application for certification to the Arizona Department of Gaming to provide off-track betting services…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Trybulski v. Bellows Falls Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Perry v. Medical Practice BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- In Re Stephanie N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- T.P. Racing, L.L.L.P. v. Arizona Department of RacingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009