Howard Herrin v. N.C. St. L. Ry. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
* Indorsement, "To the order of any bank or banker," as a restrictive indorsement, see note in 10 A.L.R., 709. The only question presented to us herein is the liability of certain indorsers upon a promissory note. The chancellor decreed against these indorsers in favor of the holder. The court of appeals reversed the decree of the chancellor in this particular, and the case is before us upon the holder's petition forcertiorari, heretofore granted.
On December 9, 1919, W.H. Underwood purchased a tract of land in Giles county, and in payment for same executed his four notes of that date payable,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Bank of Rolla v. First National Bank of SalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Meador v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. Security Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Mercantile Bank of Memphis v. BusbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnston v. SchnabaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edgecombe Bonded Warehouse Co. v. Security National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939