Legal Opinion
State v. Bailey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 7, 1993No. 11688PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1), and risk of injury to a child, in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. The defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly invoked the constancy of accusation exception to the hearsay rule, (2) the trial court improperly admitted evidence of a prior conviction of the defendant for breaking and entering, and (3) trial counsel’s performance was not reasonably competent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. AskewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. ZoravaliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Jeffrey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.