Gee v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the Ideal option law. When the case was called" for trial appellant moved to continue the case on account of the absence of Mark and Ophelia Black. By these witnesses he expected to prove that the State’s witness and alleged purchaser, Winniger, on or about the 25th of February, 1909, while at the hous'e of said"witnesses'Black, stated to them, that his, witness’ father had given or offered to give said witness a horse, bridle and saddle if he would testify against this defendant in this case. This evidence was sought to impeach…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- McMurtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Butts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Rodgers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wragg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Baxter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.