Legal Opinion

Hackworth v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 17, 1971PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD P. HILL, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict for the ap-pellees on the trial of appellants’ action for damages based upon an allegation that a vasectomy operation performed by appel- lee Dr. Ernest Hart on the appellant Harvey Hackworth was unsuccessful. The appellants relied both upon a contract and negligence.

The judgment does not state the grounds upon which the trial court directed the verdict for the appellees, but in the appellants’ brief it is said that the trial court based its decision upon the failure of the appellants to prove…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  2. Tomlinson v. SiehlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Graham v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Jones v. FurnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. Sera Linke v. A. R. Sorenson and R. SorensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. William B. Lashlee, Jr. v. Morris E. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API