Legal Opinion
(PC) Rodriguez v. Mendoza
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00410Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-0410 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING THE 14 MENDOZA, et al., CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 15 Defendants. (Docs. 44, 56) 16 17 Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. asserts that the defendants, correctional officers at Kern Valley 18 State Prison, violated his civil rights arising under the Eighth Amendment. This action proceeds 19 against Mendoza for failure to protect and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Porter v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.